In the first and second quarters of 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized changes to how employer-sponsored group health plans determine if their prescription drug coverage is “creditable” for Medicare Part D purposes. For HR professionals, this marks a shift to simplified processes, more precise actuarial determinations, and clearer compliance pathways.
Under previous rules, plan sponsors were required to determine whether their prescription drug coverage was creditable—meaning the plan was expected to pay, on average, at least as much as standard Medicare Part D coverage. This involved actuarial analysis, especially for plans that didn’t closely resemble Medicare Part D in benefit design.
There are currently two sanctioned methods to find out if coverage is creditable for Medicare Part D: a simplified determination method and an actuarial method. Many employer plan sponsors use the former to assess creditable coverage status for their prescription drug coverage.
Now, the recent CMS update to the simplified determination method will allow many employer-sponsored plans to employ the simplified determination method, as long as they meet specific plan design criteria.1
The updated method outlines several plan design features deemed creditable by default. If your prescription drug plan meets these criteria, you can use the simplified determination from CMS and skip the actuarial certification process.
Here’s a quick overview of those plan design features:2
CMS has also published model notices and checklists to help employers self-assess whether they meet the simplified criteria.3, 4 These include guidance on high-deductible health plans and plan design recommendations exceeding the 72% threshold.
The notices from CMS clarify that for calendar year 2026 only, non-Retiree Drug Subsidy (RDS) group health plan providers can choose to use either the current simplified determination method or the revised simplified determination method to decide whether or not their prescription drug coverage is creditable.1
For 2027, the notice states that CMS intends no longer to allow the use of the current simplified determination method. If finalized, non-RDS group health plan providers will need to use either the actuarial method or the revised simplified determination method for the 2027 calendar year.1
As a reminder, employer plan sponsors will generally determine the creditable coverage status of their group health plans as outlined below:
HR professionals and those overseeing benefits for employers with Medicare-eligible employees or retirees, are responsible for distributing creditable coverage notices each year. That usually occurs by October 15, before the annual Medicare open enrollment period begins.
Failing to accurately determine and disclose creditable status can result in significant employee confusion and even financial penalties for Medicare-eligible individuals who delay Part D enrollment based on incorrect assumptions about their employer coverage.
The simplified rules reduce the burden on HR teams by:
Check whether your plans meet one of the five simplified criteria. If so, document your findings internally.
CMS has issued revised model notices aligned with the new rules—be sure to use them.3
Make sure the new simplified rules are reflected in your compliance calendar and employee communications protocols.
Use this opportunity to refresh your Medicare communications strategy—especially for employees approaching age 65 or already Medicare-eligible.
While CMS has indicated that actuarial determinations will still be required for “non-standard” plan designs (e.g., high-deductible or limited coverage), most employer-sponsored group health plans should now fall within the simplified framework.
If you’re not already preparing to implement the new simplified creditable coverage rules, now’s the time. With the 2025 open enrollment season approaching, leveraging these changes can streamline compliance and enhance employee support.
R. Edward Johnson, ASA, MAAA, FCA
Senior Vice President
Actuarial & Underwriting Practice Leader